Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 5
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Feb 18, 2026.
Public comments (5)
Attorney for Riverside Legacy argued its five parcels are clean per site studies and EPA; urged the council to exclude them or face a regulatory-taking claim.
City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 2:21:00 →Representing CCAEJ, strongly supported the moratorium, citing the Stringfellow acid pits' history of harm.
City Council - Jan 14, 2026 · 2:14:53 →As a court-recognized party to the Stringfellow cleanup, supported the moratorium but clarified no one is currently being exposed — the concern is protecting cleanup infrastructure during any development.
City Council - Jan 14, 2026 · 2:16:01 →Consultant for Riverside Legacy, asked the council to narrow the moratorium to exclude his client's 22-acre property, which he said is proven uncontaminated, calling the ordinance an illegal exaction.
City Council - Jan 14, 2026 · 2:18:30 →Longtime auto-recycling property owner who spent $300,000 on his own environmental study; asked not to be penalized for the Superfund site and offered to partner with the city.
City Council - Jan 14, 2026 · 2:22:11 →