Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Temporary Events and Noise Ordinance (ZCA26003)→At a glance
- Public comments
- 4
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 15, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Complained live-band parties vibrate his windows past 3 a.m., the city app took three days to respond, and urged code enforcement to write citations like Ontario and Chino do.
City Council - Oct 15, 2026 · 14:30 →A 20-year resident described recurring Saturday-night parties at several nearby homes exceeding noise ordinance limits, said deputies can't respond fast enough, suggested code enforcement help, and questioned whether a ticket was torn up at the promise of council intervention.
City Council - Aug 6, 2026 · 54:49 →Warned the ordinance would let neighbors blare music near newborns, said decibel standards are incomprehensible to ordinary residents, and noted many residents work weekends.
City Council - Jul 16, 2026 · 2:57:01 →Disputed the lieutenant's account that deputies always respond, saying officers drove past a loud event on his street without stopping.
City Council - Jul 16, 2026 · 2:52:06 →Said the 75-person allowance ignores lot sizes and street parking, questioned the church/nonprofit exemption language, flagged porta-potties as a party warning sign, and suggested Eastvale-style rules.
City Council - Jul 16, 2026 · 3:02:11 →Strongly opposed pushing quiet hours from 10 to 11 p.m. on weekends, citing shift workers, school-aged children, and stretched-thin enforcement.
City Council - Jul 16, 2026 · 2:59:36 →Supports clarifying event rules but wants the 75-person exemption to clearly exclude commercial events, not just private family gatherings.
City Council - Jul 16, 2026 · 2:54:31 →