O
Jurupa Valley
← Community
DevelopmentCommunity discussion

Camino Terrace Apartments

Jurupa Valley

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (10)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
11
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Mar 18, 2026.

Public comments (16)

SupportiveRebecca LaneMar 18, 2026

Speaking for the applicant, clarified that the fire department letter listed standard plan-check conditions, not violations, and said a flat prohibition on blasting would be treated as a denial.

City Council - Mar 18, 2026 · 3:04:52 →
OpposedBenny StensinMar 18, 2026

Opposed the project, citing no elevators for three-story buildings, fire truck access failures in a past fire, and calling the site a 'death trap'; urged denial.

City Council - Mar 18, 2026 · 3:09:56 →
OpposedJeff RiggsMar 18, 2026

Opposed the project over insufficient parking, fire truck access, and the near-impossibility of insuring blasting so close to homes, predicting years of jackhammering instead.

City Council - Mar 18, 2026 · 3:14:25 →
OpposedUnidentified ResidentMar 18, 2026

Said neighbors have supplied dozens of documented safety reasons for denial, questioned why the fire department's conditions haven't been answered, and worried about overflow parking permits.

City Council - Mar 18, 2026 · 3:17:15 →
OpposedMichael ArroyoMar 18, 2026

Asked that any blasting approval require a minimum $10 million bond, and warned of ember-driven wildfire risk, ADA and fire truck access problems at the site.

City Council - Mar 18, 2026 · 3:18:02 →
OpposedBetty StinsonFeb 18, 2026

Long-time resident asked about elevators, third-floor evacuation, parking on Skyview, and urged the council to think with their hearts.

City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:22:54 →
OpposedTeresa RamosFeb 18, 2026

Disabled resident since 1988 challenged the council to walk the hill; questioned bus stops and parking math (AAA 1.2 cars/household).

City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:25:13 →
OpposedGabriella BaumerFeb 18, 2026

Said the property is beautiful and should hold taxable luxury homes, not tax-exempt renters, and called the site unsafe.

City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:28:22 →
OpposedJeff RiggsFeb 18, 2026

Opposed the project, citing parking, fire department access, and suggesting Crestmore and Mission as a better site.

City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:12:16 →
OpposedJulian GranadaFeb 18, 2026

Iraqi war veteran citing Eaton/Palisades fire evacuations and Lymanite closure gridlock; said 80 new residents would worsen escape routes.

City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:37:01 →
OpposedJerry RomeroFeb 18, 2026

Mountain Shadow Drive resident: 106 spaces for 80 units will overflow into small neighborhood streets; sight distance at Canyon Terrace/Camino Real is dangerous; asked council to vote no.

City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:40:04 →
OpposedLucas CzerwinskiFeb 18, 2026

Represented Canyon Terrace residents; detailed Calfire fire-map inconsistencies, documented fire history, 16% grade access concerns, and unmet fire-code width standards; complained about blasting representations changing.

City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:30:38 →
OpposedKaz (Unidentified Resident)Feb 18, 2026

Cited power line burial costs, parking shortfall (80 units/40 spots), blind corner on the 16% grade, and blasting history.

City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:14:20 →
OpposedSteven BayerFeb 18, 2026

39-year Canyon Terrace resident described past fires and a brake-failure descent, saying the location is unsafe.

City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:17:29 →
OpposedRay PlacentiaFeb 18, 2026

Veteran's father who supports helping veterans but opposes building on the hillside due to fire hazard and emergency access.

City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:18:40 →
ConcernedDiana ButtsFeb 18, 2026

Requested third-party structural inspections of nearby homes before/after blasting; asked for a Camino Real entrance and more parking.

City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:20:30 →