Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 11
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 18, 2026.
Public comments (16)
Speaking for the applicant, clarified that the fire department letter listed standard plan-check conditions, not violations, and said a flat prohibition on blasting would be treated as a denial.
City Council - Mar 18, 2026 · 3:04:52 →Opposed the project, citing no elevators for three-story buildings, fire truck access failures in a past fire, and calling the site a 'death trap'; urged denial.
City Council - Mar 18, 2026 · 3:09:56 →Opposed the project over insufficient parking, fire truck access, and the near-impossibility of insuring blasting so close to homes, predicting years of jackhammering instead.
City Council - Mar 18, 2026 · 3:14:25 →Said neighbors have supplied dozens of documented safety reasons for denial, questioned why the fire department's conditions haven't been answered, and worried about overflow parking permits.
City Council - Mar 18, 2026 · 3:17:15 →Asked that any blasting approval require a minimum $10 million bond, and warned of ember-driven wildfire risk, ADA and fire truck access problems at the site.
City Council - Mar 18, 2026 · 3:18:02 →Long-time resident asked about elevators, third-floor evacuation, parking on Skyview, and urged the council to think with their hearts.
City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:22:54 →Disabled resident since 1988 challenged the council to walk the hill; questioned bus stops and parking math (AAA 1.2 cars/household).
City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:25:13 →Said the property is beautiful and should hold taxable luxury homes, not tax-exempt renters, and called the site unsafe.
City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:28:22 →Opposed the project, citing parking, fire department access, and suggesting Crestmore and Mission as a better site.
City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:12:16 →Iraqi war veteran citing Eaton/Palisades fire evacuations and Lymanite closure gridlock; said 80 new residents would worsen escape routes.
City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:37:01 →Mountain Shadow Drive resident: 106 spaces for 80 units will overflow into small neighborhood streets; sight distance at Canyon Terrace/Camino Real is dangerous; asked council to vote no.
City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:40:04 →Represented Canyon Terrace residents; detailed Calfire fire-map inconsistencies, documented fire history, 16% grade access concerns, and unmet fire-code width standards; complained about blasting representations changing.
City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:30:38 →Cited power line burial costs, parking shortfall (80 units/40 spots), blind corner on the 16% grade, and blasting history.
City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:14:20 →39-year Canyon Terrace resident described past fires and a brake-failure descent, saying the location is unsafe.
City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:17:29 →Veteran's father who supports helping veterans but opposes building on the hillside due to fire hazard and emergency access.
City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:18:40 →Requested third-party structural inspections of nearby homes before/after blasting; asked for a Camino Real entrance and more parking.
City Council - Feb 18, 2026 · 1:20:30 →